Quirk

Discover your money personality

Quirk is a personal finance app that helps young people learn about and manage their finances according to their personality and interests, so that they can ultimately make better financial decisions that align with their life goals.

Download

What is the problem?

T his service evolved from research on the ‘Spark’ design proposition where the team explored how best to customise financial services to people’s personalities. Spark helped people discover their money personality and then offered tailored insights and tips to align their spending with their personality, and easier access to financial services based on a financial wellbeing score dependent on the user’s behaviour. The proposition ‘Spark’, demonstrated clear demand and user engagement, but raised questions about how vulnerable these systems may be to bias (against particular personalities), with users gaming the system or faking their behaviour to improve their financial wellbeing score.

Quirk is the next evolution of Spark- The team set out to launch Quirk to the market and had to take a more refined approach, which wouldn’t expose customers to Spark’s vulnerabilities. Quirk adapted its focus from “wellbeing and happiness” to “financial health” because most people still struggle to manage money. In the UK, 40% of people don’t have savings, 44% of 16-24 year olds have dipped into their overdraft in the past year, and 84% of adults feel they aren’t financially literate after leaving high school.  With this statistical backdrop, the team found that financial services get better engagement from users when the focus is on building financial literacy and improving financial health (saving more/getting out of debt) rather than about how much happiness can be gained through optimising spending to your personality.

Additionally, the team found that startups generally have to start their life by focusing on one achievable feature that users need and expand the offering later, once the user base has grown. In this instance, as financial services are highly regulated, it was more appropriate to focus on financial literacy and build a product that focused on personal finance management. Particularly because financial wellbeing starts with financial literacy, this would lend itself well to expanding into other features later.

Find out how we ‘Updated the strategic questions’ to define the design research strategy.
Read More

Early Testing and Development

Over the course of this prototyping and development round, the team developed multiple prototypes of many different forms to understand how people engage with the concept, how the experience of the service should be structured and how it could be branded. They also worked with psychologists to develop a more robust personality test that would help identify personality types.

One of the first things that was established was that the initial ambition of ‘Spark’ was not achievable because there was no ‘go-to-market’ strategy. Therefore, it was imperative for the product to be based on the most useful feature that can be built rapidly and then expanded on later.

The team developed clickable prototypes that were used by research participants to model an ideal service experience. Through this process, they tested a feature that connects multiple bank accounts to the app to give users an overview of their finances. Testing showed that people liked the feature, but were uneasy about going through a bank lining process that seemed like quite a significant data-sharing commitment before really understanding the value of the app. Through an iterative development process, the team arranged the onboarding experience so that users first took the personality test (which most people get value from) and then had a brief guided tour experience in the app before being asked to connect up their bank accounts.

Additionally, the team tested the service messaging and adverts and found that a fine balance had to be struck between highlighting the feature of connecting your bank accounts and getting an overview of finances, without seeming too much like a bank. It was important to differentiate Quirk from a bank as it would raise users’ expectations of features and also cause friction in getting them onboarded with Quirk.

Jump to:

Propositions

Spark

Spark is a service that helps you discover your financial personality to align it with your consumption and help you make better financial decisions and achieve financial health and wellbeing.

Find out how we ‘Reframed the user value hypotheses’.
Read More

What is Quirk?

Following the detailed analysis of the prototyping and development round, the team refined the proposal and developed a native mobile app, available in beta on both the Apple App store and the Android Play store.

Quirk was positioned as a personal finance app that helps young people learn about and manage their finances according to their personality and interests, so that they can ultimately make better financial decisions that align with their life goals.

These are it’s core features:

01

Discover your money personality

Quirk has developed its own proprietary test based on an academic study that uses the established personality frameworks to assess money attitudes and financial behaviour. People complete a quiz about their personality and money habits, which matches them with one of four personas: The Blissful, The Artist, The Optimiser and The Explorer, each of which have inherent traits and relationships with money that already help the user understand their own behaviour better. This assessment then helps tailor the rest of the service to the user’s personality type. Money doesn’t equal happiness, but when people spend their money according to their personality, it can lead to more happiness.

02

Track your spending across accounts

Quirk helps you connect all your accounts from multiple providers into the service so that you can get a comprehensive overview of all your finances. It allows you to set up a spending plan, so you can track your discretionary spending according to different merchants, categories, or tracking your recurring payments in one place.

03

Tailored insights

Quirk identifies key behavioural traits and money attitudes as well as assesses a user’s financial situation to better tailor their recommendations. This can vary from simplifying the user experience and language, to providing relevant educational content or providing tips and recommendations for different financial products. Quirk also provides data insights that help users better understand where their money is going and if they are hitting their budget and saving goals over time.

The science behind it

To better understand the drivers of what influences financial wellbeing, we found some interesting academic literature. The first widespread research study on money and happiness came from Dan Kahneman and Angus Deaton, Nobel winning economists who first discussed a ‘satiation point’ the point at which greater household income is not associated with greater happiness. That number was $75,000 or about £60,000. A more recent study that used Gallup’s World agreed with this number, but in relation to the shorter term, ‘emotional wellbeing’ how you felt in the past few days. In relation to ‘life satisfaction’, which is looking at your life as a whole, that satiation point  occurs at $95,000 as a global average. It helped reinforce that after a certain point having more money does not necessarily mean more wellbeing and happiness.

 Another study we found early on in the design process came from Cambridge University in which researchers Sandra Matz and Joe Gladstone found that people who spent more money on purchases, which matched their personality, were happier. What’s even more fascinating is that matching spending with personality showed a bigger effect on someone’s happiness than their income or total spending. Namely, it’s not about how much you spend, but how you spend it. This is linked to a wider concept in happiness research of ‘cognitive congruity’, doing things in accordance with the person you believe you are, which gave us the inspiration to help personalise financial management.

With Quirk, we set out to understand these variables a bit better and we designed our own study in which we surveyed a large representative sample of the UK population over a number of personality, happiness, and money parameters in order to find new correlations. We found that personality traits and attitudes about money can influence financial behaviour and we used these to come up with a primary set of ‘money personalities’ that help users better understand their financial behaviour, and also helps tailor how they spend and save their money in a way that increases their financial wellbeing.

Find out how we did ‘Field research’.

The trial

Based on this entire round of research and prototyping, the team developed a native app that would be available for Apple and Android users. Throughout the development of the service, a large effort was made to develop an online following of users, by writing content, promoting the website, advertising on instagram to capture users who were interested in the service. This enabled the team to fill their initial beta trial of 100 users. Over the course of 2 months, the team was able to gather a range of insights about engagement with the service.

01

Overall metrics demonstrate good engagement

Overall the basic performance indicators from the trial demonstrated that the service was well received by most users. Throughout the app’s trial period, 75% of users completed onboarding and users checked in with the app at least one a week, with an average number of three bank accounts connected to the app per person.

Through the tracking of the advertising campaign, the team were able to discern that users were most interested in improving and learning about credit and building up savings, which was great feedback for future features Quirk can implement.

Additionally, approximately 96% of all those who installed the app completed the quiz. This demonstrates that almost everyone who downloaded the app was sufficiently engaged enough with one of the main features that they went through a fairly lengthy process of completing the personality test. This was a distinct indication that users were craving a personalised perspective on their finances.

02

Personality assessments are working

Another marker of success for the service is that all the four Quirk personality types were equally represented in the trial. This demonstrates that the quiz attracted users who typically didn’t like to engage with financial services. If that were not the case, there would be imbalances in personality types between the users. Another demonstration of the efficacy of the personality test is that it correctly predicted the behaviour of the users in the app. For example, the users who check the app most frequently are users who are defined by the quiz as ‘optimisers’ who would naturally monitor their finances more closely. This is an exciting prospect because it demonstrates the opportunity for creating highly personalised services and offerings once the service has gathered more data.

03

This is the right user

The other outcome of the trial is that the service is reaching its intended target user. The service positions itself as offering tailored education and recommendation, and during the trial, it attracted young people who were looking to build up their financial literacy.So, these users are being drawn to the service because it offers personalised financial recommendations, while educating them —ultimately demonstrating a strong match between user need and service proposition.

This also gives a clear focus for the future of Quirk. Currently, the main features c are the personality test and the clearer financial tracking. Now, the priority can be to strengthen the personalised recommendation capabilities that can support people in deciding what to do next.

Recommended readings

Dimensions of change

Money

The meaning of money may change as it is tied to our emotions, our communities and our responsibilities in a world that may blame capitalism for inequality and climate change.

Scenarios

Emotional money

AI could advance to levels that would allow sophisticated understanding of people’s emotions. If that information is coupled with financial behaviours or organisational objectives it could transform how value is assigned to our services and our experiences.

Proposition Types

Agency Enhancers

Developing a deeper AI driven understanding of yourself to influence your decisions and optimise for your happiness and prosperity.

Emerging discussions

Automating or enabling

Within app development discourse, there is a logic that users must get quick value  to maintain engagement until a user is invested enough to stick with the service and continue giving it time or even money. This approach is also validated in Quirk. As we previously discussed, users needed to be shown quick value from a self-discovery quiz before embracing the app. It became more challenging in its  objective to educate people. While this process can be made fun, it still requires people to make their own decisions to work through some sort of learning cycle where they have to take action in order to learn, which wouldn’t happen if the service was purely automated.

Making decisions is something that many new financial technology services are targeting as a problem and are actively removing from the user experience.Does this represent a threat to genuinely enabling financial services? Does this dampen people’s willingness to engage in a service that has a higher expectation of them? Or is Quirk an indication that there is a growing appetite in the market for services that give people enough respect to make their own decisions and value the longer term educational benefits?

While some research now demonstrates that giving users some element of choice actually improves their engagement with a service, it is not clear how much choice is engaging and how much is considered laborious. Financial education services like this, will need to find a positioning that is automatic enough not to be laborious or boring, but offer enough choice that it is still educational. Some things should be easier and predetermined for the user, but for other things it is more powerful if the user decides, for instance, how much money to save each month.

Fin tech industry is segmented across products and services

Another interesting consideration, which emerged from analysing the market as Quirk developed the product, was thatost fintech startups focus solely on one specific feature that they can deliver exceptionally well and then they expand into other features and other offerings later. This approach seems to contradict one of the founding considerations of the Quirk service, which is that people don’t think of their finances in terms of distinct banking features and products, they see them more holistically. Quirk has to balance not being stretched too thin by offering everything to everyone, but also finding the right balance in offering people a holistic view of their finances.

Humans are better

Another consideration arising from the process is about the right moment to introduce humans to the service. It is undeniable that human financial advisers are currently far superior to any automated advice service. For this reason,  when a user’s requirements become too complex they would be referred to a human Quirk advisor.

The interesting discussion is about when a human service should be offered and how it can be integrated with digital advice. Most people using the service are doing so because they can not afford an advisor or they feel their needs are not complex enough to warrant it. Can the use of digital financial services reduce the cost of giving one-on-one advice? Can they make the one-on-one advice more personalised when they do? And can they be used to enhance the implementation of whatever human advice was given?

The right amount of engagement

Investors typically look at the number of users who are active on the service everyday as a good measure of engagement and therefore the value of the business opportunity.This perception is aligned with ideas that people‘s screen time with a service is akin to the value they take from it. However, rapid and quick interactions with people’s money does not necessarily promote wellbeing and even worse can promote anxiety. Quirk, in its current form, essentially enables people to be more aware of how they are spending their money and then act on this. If people are constantly nudged to engage with the service through prompting messages and alerts, it could trigger people who are already concerned about money to constantly monitor their spending.

The service will have to establish ways to validate their principle that money should not be all-consuming, in fact, that the service could be more successful if it carefully avoids inducing anxiety by raising awareness in the right ways, looking for infrequent quality time rather than higher frequency quick moments.

Team
Nafeesa Jafferjee
Nikolaos Melachrinos

Other services developed

hold-hero-image-xploratory

Live Services

Hold

Hold is an app that gives people the personal space to let out whatever is on their mind and relax knowing that it is stored safely. It helps people give structure to their internal dialogue making self reflection become more effective.

Live Services

Edit

Edit is an app that helps you fill your daily routine with more positive actions than smoking. It’s not about quitting cold turkey or feeling like a patient. It’s just about trying new things and seeing if they work for you and your lifestyle.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

Quirk

Discover your money personality

Greencoin tracks your environmental impact. When you have a positive impact, you earn Greencoin currency. You can  spend it on sustainable products.

What is the problem

Man-made environmental damage is a looming, multifaceted threat that is deeply felt by many people with a strong sense of stewardship over the planet and concern for social justice, their loved ones and future generations. The need to act is increasingly in the public mindset, but  lack of clear information around the positive or negative impact of people’s choices, both as individuals and as a collective, make efforts feel wasted and can be a large disincentive to take decisive action.

How Greencoin responds

Greencoin provides a fully transparent tracing infrastructure and unified ‘GreenScore’ points system to give a clear understanding of the impact of your decisions. Coupled with this new awareness is a currency called Greencoin, which is earned through environmentally positive performance. The service measures and incentivises good behaviour and enables all types of value chains to incorporate environmental value far more.

Get rewarded for being sustainable:
Every sustainable action you do or product you purchase will reward you with Greencoin and increase your GreenScore.

Know your impact:
Helps you truly understand how your actions have an impact on the planet.

Spend your ethical money:
Use your Greencoin to buy sustainable products and services in the knowledge that you have earnt them and that they are good for the planet.

Take responsibility collectively:
Connect your communities and share your score to get collective GreenScores, so you can act together or compete with rivals.

Find out how we did a ‘backcasting of the value propositions’.

What we
learnt

We demonstrated a low fidelity prototype of Greencoin to high-need users and this is what we learned:

  • Our extreme users’ response to this was that it would support actions they currently struggled with because a unified platform would help them consistently balance money and ethics in a robust and informed way, while also providing  financial benefits.

Essentially, they see the access to clear and reliable information as a form of empowerment that would help them know they were doing all they could and help them do better.Emerging areas of interest around this proposition are about:

  • the use of the metrics; 
  • the origins of authority within the service; and,
  •  its roots in capitalism
Find out how we ‘Discussed the implications of the prototypes’.

01

Use of the metrics

People describe wanting to use the scores and coins as a way to educate their families and friends and to support their arguments for more positive behaviour. It seems that advocates for environmental action would find ways to integrate these metrics into everyday life to preach their message to others as well as to game, compete and police their own lives.
Could the use of the metrics distance people from the underlying values and reasons for them?
Could the distinction between a high and low scoring person create new types of barriers and judgements between people?
How does the proposition compensate for effort when we consider that different people have different capacities to ‘act environmentally’ and that the score could be felt as a judgement?

02

Authority

One of the main discussions around the service was about who had the authority to initiate the service and to make judgements about the environmental practices of ‘everything’. This was questioned from the angle of what was technically feasible to achieve as well as who or what process had enough neutral respect and authority in the public eye that it could legitimately administer these judgements without fear of corruption or bias. This question ultimately unveils the need for someone to design algorithmic assessments that would ‘solve’ ethical dilemmas at a global scale, (e.g. Which scores higher, a book printed in europe or an amazon kindle made in china?). What happens if these assessments are made incorrectly? if they influence people disproportionately? If they are corrupted? While the question is profound, ultimately, our users were comfortable settling on authoritative figures in their lives such as David Attenborough or ‘Which?’ (the consumer goods reviewing service).

03

Capitalism

For us, the final area of emerging discussion within this space is about the clear alignment of this model with the capitalistic prerequisite for growth. The proposal could be described as totalitarian-hyper-eco-capitalism. It is clear that growth in its current form cannot be sustained, but what other models are needed and how might civilisation navigate from the current state to the next? Would models like this enable a stepping stone in cultural change? Would it prolong a delusion? If it did facilitate change, would this be the right direction?

jump to

Propositions

Ethos

Ethos learns, tracks and guides people’s behaviours to help them live more in line with their values and beliefs.

Propositions

Pulse

Pulse extends your gaming life outside of the digital space in order to incentivise healthy activities and prevent gaming from becoming detrimental.

Our new direction of exploration

If this proposition is progressed, the strategic question of relevance to our investigations is more along the lines of:

How might technology affect the way micro-actions are influenced at large scale to support people’s values and prevent catastrophes, while avoiding manipulation, corruption and collective mistakes?

Other services developed

hold-hero-image-xploratory

Live Services

Hold

Hold is an app that gives people the personal space to let out whatever is on their mind and relax knowing that it is stored safely. It helps people give structure to their internal dialogue making self reflection become more effective.

Live Services

Edit

Edit is an app that helps you fill your daily routine with more positive actions than smoking. It’s not about quitting cold turkey or feeling like a patient. It’s just about trying new things and seeing if they work for you and your lifestyle.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

Body

Your relationship with your body may be under pressure, but you could have more capacity than ever to control it.

The forces acting on ‘Body’ in the future

Among the many forces influencing people’s relationship with their body in the future, we explore new ways to control your body and new ways we may feel pressured about them.

With the emergence of technology that lives in, on and around the body, we can foresee an ever growing capacity to monitor and analyse all aspects of our body and mind. This ability to understand ourselves in more quantified ways may alter how we make decisions about our lives and health, particularly alongside the notion that lifespans may be dramatically extended. There may be advanced tools and techniques to adapt and control people’s rituals, habits and behaviours.

We also observe potential scenarios where intensified and expanded forms of social media use sophisticated behavioural economics and catalysed social pressure to obligate people to live publically and share intimately. These new social pressures may amplify anxiety in those who are already uncomfortable with their body image. Is it possible that people will increasingly adopt a mindset where dominance over their bodies means being in harmony with them?

With these potential forces acting on people’s relationship with their bodies, we explore three hypothetical scenarios: Personal Control, Structured Social Judgement and Smart Aging.

01

Personal control

Obsession with measuring everything that goes in and out of the body amplifies obsessive conditions. Personal identity becomes the virtual idealised (perfect) self instead of current physical reality. Devices measure everything and anything about people.

Jump To:

Service visions

Eidos

Eatopia is a platform with the mission to support individuals on the journey to plant-based diets by promoting a choice of healthy plant-based products over those which contain a lot of sugar, fat, sodium and meat.
Find out how we ‘Explored the future landscape with the project client’.
Read More
02

Structured Social Judgement

Constant social media judgement could lead to extended states of anxiety, potentially making people attempt to perfect their outward appearance. Data could be collected against people’s will and without their knowledge, leading to further control over people’s behaviour.

Jump To:

Service visions

Perfect friends

Perfect friends is a group of AI Agents that support your mental wellbeing with positive machine-learning-powered messages that model positive human interactions.
Find out how we ‘Prioritised the societal dimensions related to health and happiness’.
03

Smart Ageing

People’s life expectancy may seem to perpetually extend without people really knowing when death may come. Living with an ageing body will be a longer part of life and therefore illness is even more problematic. People may dedicate more of their life to extending their lives.

Jump To:

Service Visions

Dignitime

Dignitime quantifies all your actions in relation to how they will reduce or increase your life expectancy and how happy they make you.

Recommended readings

Proposition Types

Relationship Facilitators

Creating and facilitating relationships through enhanced empathy and compatibility.

Proposition Types

Agency Enhancers

Developing a deeper AI driven understanding of yourself to influence your decisions and optimise for your happiness and prosperity.

Proposition Types

Self-Editors

Optimising and Editing yourself and your life to meet your personal criteria for success.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

The commoditisation of our needs and values to incentivise behaviour change

Need Commoditisers

New wealth, new trade offs, same data battle

The advanced digitisation of our lives could result in the quantifying and subsequent unionisation of different aspects of behaviour and the values that drive them. This could lead to the trading, gaming, competing and collecting of those units as if they were commodities, and the use of these commodities by ourselves and others to influence our behaviour further.

For example, someone’s commitment to environmental causes could be measured and coded and turned into earnable credits or tokens. Then, the environmentally positive behaviour is transformed into a currency because that behaviour has an understood value in multiple contexts, to multiple people.

What might be down the path?

Within this new service role, we can envisage an extension of the concept of ‘the quantified self’. In other words, data simply provides insight, to the user and potentially others, into a dynamic where the data is commoditised as a proxy for the behaviour that led to it. As a consequence, we may see trends around new types of ‘wealth’ resulting from new ways of comparing value between people and companies. We may see tangible connections drawn between different areas of our lives like happiness and health leading to previously unseen, data driven trade-offs. And we may see a power struggle as users try to harness the value of their own actions and data for themselves and for others while continuing to grapple with concepts of privacy and protection.

Each design proposition is a vehicle that helps map this territory.

Find out how we ‘Framed strategic questions’ to define the design research.
Read More
01

Greencoin

Greencoin is a proposition that tracks your environmental impact. When you have a positive impact you earn Greencoin currency, which can be spent on sustainable products.

02

Pulse

Pulse is a proposition that extends your gaming life outside of the digital space to incentivise healthy activities and prevent gaming from becoming detrimental.

03

Qualitime

Qualitime is a proposition that helps you track how everything you do influences your happiness and your life expectancy, so that you can decide what is most important to you.

04

Ethos

Ethos is a proposition that learns, tracks and guides your behaviours to help you live more in line with your values and beliefs.

Jump to:

Proposition Types

Agency Enhancers

Developing a deeper AI driven understanding of yourself to influence your decisions and optimise for your happiness and prosperity.

Proposition Types

Self-Editors

Optimising and Editing yourself and your life to meet your personal criteria for success.

Other Proposition types

Proposition Types

Ethics Providers

Platforms as facilitators and brokers of value judgements. It’s possible that in the future we could foresee an advancement of AI with the ability to codify and model the highly complex ethical parameters of everyday life.

Proposition Types

Relationship Facilitators

Creating and facilitating relationships through enhanced empathy and compatibility.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

Quirk

Discover your money personality

Early testing and development

We developed a prototype that would be the simplest version of our service- This prototype could meaningfully mimic the final offering, so we could experiment, understand the user experience and hone the final proposition before investing too heavily in a native app for the public.

Therefore,we created a web app which encouraged users to ask themselves a question and then subsequently answer this question. The intent was that users would inadvertently find themselves having a fluid conversation with themselves where they may recognise more of their own capacity to respond to their challenges with a clearer thought process.

We recruited 30 users aged 20-50 years old who had a mixed level of self-declared anxiety to use the service as much as they wished over a two week period. Through interviews with the participants, their usage data,  survey responses and the contents of their conversations, we were able to gain many new insights about the experience of our proposition.

The most crucial learning was that most people were sceptical about the idea of having conversations with themselves. People often felt it was embarrassing, ineffective or weren’t quite sure what to do. However, we also found that some people (including some sceptics) were surprised that the process eventually provided strong results for them by helping them think more clearly, feel listened to or even feel less alone. With these main insights, we focussed on guiding and simplifying the conversation process and tried to manage user expectations from the start.

In addition, we found that people wanted more than to just have and store conversations, they wanted to be given a new understanding of themselves based on what they had written. While there are many advanced mechanisms for delivering more understanding, the team sought out new, simple methods to curate their conversations in ways that would show them new insight. One approach to this was to give more emphasis to an already appreciated mood rating feature within the prototype.

Find out how we ‘Updated the strategic questions’ to define the design research strategy.

What is the problem?

This service evolved from research on the EQLs design proposition where we explored how to reduce anxiety in people who struggle to self-reflect. EQLs offered people a range of AI characters to talk to that would support them, monitor their mood and alert them to patterns in their behaviour that influence their happiness. The topics arising from this proposition, which warranted further investigation, were about how people feel about having their emotional status analysed? How comfortable are people sharing intimate information with a digital service? And what types of values people can take from non-human interactions?

We continued our research and found that many young people suffering from anxiety were not engaging with self-reflection because it was often ineffective. And while conversational types of reflection with other people were valued, they were seen as unsafe from a social or emotional perspective, and therefore often avoided. This perception of a lack of safety was often connected to the idea that self-reflection meant you had a mental health problem and therefore shared some of the same stigma.

We chose an approach of developing heuristics that uses conversation to help people build rituals and skills for effective self-reflection in order to ultimately build emotional resilience and agency over their lives. We explored simple technological ways to foster the valuable attributes of conversation with ‘another’, because it is effective and familiar, but does not involve a second human— as it is seen as ‘unsafe’

Download

Not much in order to boost my mood or help me if I’m not feeling great.
It surprised me that playing both roles in a conversation – physically typing the issue and then generating the response yourself is so effective. I might have been very sceptical to be honest but actually doing it showed me how helpful this is to my peace of mind.

What is Hold’?

Following the detailed analysis of the prototype trial, as well as online engagement testing and user interface experiments, we refined the proposal and developed a native web app, available on the Appstore and Playstore.

The proposal was positioned as a tool that helped people think clearly through difficult moments by enabling structured self-conversation. Essentially borrowing the format of conversation with another person, but making it safe, anonymous, private, always available, and easier to reflect on and learn from.

01

Structure self conversation

The main function of the app is a self-conversation feature. The user can start a conversation either by asking themselves a question or simply by saying whatever is on their mind. Immediately after doing this, they are asked to continue depending on how they started, i.e. if they started by saying what is on their mind, then they are prompted to ask themselves a question about what they’ve just said, and then subsequently to answer the question and so on. As they express what they are thinking, their words are displayed in a familiar messenger style conversation format that helps suspend the belief that they are discussing something with someone else.

The conversation can be typed or spoken and the words the user says will be translated into text. At any point, the user can hear an artificial voice (with an accent and gender of their choice) read out their words.

At the end of each conversation, the user is asked to rate their mood and define a title to apply to the conversation.

02

Conversation reflection

All conversations are stored with their titles in a log where they are organised based on the chronology or the mood rating they logged at the time. When a user re-reads a conversation, they can find questions from the app that encourage a healthy and inquisitive reflection of what was written. Additionally, conversations are grouped together automatically based on simple traits such as the most viewed, or highest mood rated. Beyond the automatic collections, users are also prompted to group conversations in more sophisticated classifications such as the topic, or the environment they were written in or the type of emotion they felt.

These different levels of reflective activity encourage users to use the app not just to vent and cathartically divulge their thoughts, but to investigate, consider and understand themselves further.

03

Guided thinking

Throughout the app there is a guiding voice which instructs the user if they are unsure about anything. It bolsters a perception of authority, builds the user’s trust and encourages them to engage with the app. It is this guiding voice that offers a steady selection of optional prompt questions during the conversation as well as reflection questions if they return to their conversations or create collections from them. The positionality of the voice is written to be neutral, trustworthy, informed, non-judgemental and open to support the user in whatever they choose.

04

Respectful in its position

This positioning of the guiding voice within the app was also mirrored through the entire environment and all brand touchpoints. We found in our exploration of the market that synonymous services tended to either ‘own’ the fact their service was a mental health app or disguise it with playfulness, but in all instances they still required the user to admit an emotional issue. Given the associated stigma, it seemed to put up barriers for many of our users. With hold, we try to be honest and clear about the tool rather than being too heavily branded. We reduced clutter, created neutral space and had no tacky characters in an attempt to respect the process that people are going through during use.

Jump to:

Service visions

Perfect friends

Perfect friends is a group of AI Agents that support your mental wellbeing with positive machine-learning-powered messages that model positive human interactions.

Propositions

EQLS

EQLS is a digital space where people can speak to AI characters about anything they’d like. They help people learn about themselves and they help life get easier.

Find out how we ‘Reframed the user value hypotheses’.

Jump to:

Proposition Types

Agency Enhancers

Developing a deeper AI driven understanding of yourself to influence your decisions and optimise for your happiness and prosperity.

The science behind it

To create an environment that supports self-reflection, we enlisted well established psychological frameworks to underpin the structure and content of the conversations people construct.

The objective is to support the user in different types of reflective practice that can span from simply expressing what is on their mind,  through to critical self-reflection (i.e.self-reflection that is more aware of time, place and context). The ultimate objective is to reveal deeper assumptions that may transform people’s lives.

The prompt questions in the app are designed considering the working memory model to enrich and bolster self-reflection at a cognitive level. This is done by encouraging expression that provokes long-term and short-term memory, audio and visual stimuli as well as multiple modes of thought such as simple expression vs critical thinking  (Baddeley & Hitch‘s (1974) theory of Working Memory). The questions are also tuned to provoke varied modes of language, which help users illustrate their reflections with greater description, narration, examination or consideration, thus creating a deeper, broader engagement with the reflection content. The aim is to encourage greater awareness, control and insight about the reflection, the act of self-reflection and therefore their own thoughts, feelings and behaviours. (Cubero et al., 2008)

Encouraging the user to reflect not just on their situation, but on their understanding of their situation helps build their knowledge of how they think as well as their ability to plan, monitor and assess how they think. This is called meta cognition; it is a skill which may help build people’s emotional resilience and ultimately their ability to control their thoughts and their life.
(Schraw,1994; Schraw,1998; Schraw & Dennison, 1994; Sperling, Howard, Miller, &   Murphy, 2002; Sperling, Howard, Staley, & DuBois, 2004 cited in Hussain: 2015; 134)

Through these models, we refined attributes of the guidance and content in the app as well as established brand positioning and features such as the text-to-voice playback.

Jump to:

Scenarios

Structured Social Judgement

Constant social media judgement could lead to extended states of anxiety potentially making people attempt to perfect their outward appearance. Data could be collected against people’s will and without their knowledge and lead to further control over people’s behaviour.

Find out how we did ‘Field research’.

The trial

From the 12th December to the 20th January 2019, we ran a trial where we promoted and monitored the app and subsequently conducted a series of interviews with engaged users. From the trial we took five main learnings.

01

The product is desirable

Over the entire period, we had 2712 users with an average of 11.3% of them returning to use the app later. These users completed 1123 conversations consisting of 6497 thought entries (different stages of the conversation). On average, 59% of people who clicked on our adverts downloaded the app. During our most optimised week, we spent £400 on advertising, resulting in 208 fully engaged users costing just £1.25 each to acquire. This high conversion percentage and the low cost of engaging a new user demonstrates that the proposition is highly desirable.

02

Conversations are valued in two distinct ways

There are two distinct ways that people found value in having conversations with themselves. Firstly, the initial expression allows a cathartic unpacking of complex, anxious or out of control thoughts, which provides an in-the-moment release and calm. Secondly, the subsequent extended conversation reframes users’ mindset so they can further understand their context and thoughts, and then potentially progress toward a conclusion —ultimately providing a calming way to process thought and reach new understandings.

03

Revisiting conversations can be challenging but offers reassurance, learning & pride

Different users engage with past conversations in different ways and for different reasons. Some users are intimidated by the intensity of the emotion in their conversations and avoid it to protect themselves; some users want to see their conversations but only when there are enough of them to find bigger insights or to feel proud of how many they have; and finally, some users revisit after each conversation. They return in a calm moment or a stressful moment, but when they do, they often find assurance that they can get through what they are experiencing because they can see the evidence that they have done so before. It also helps them learn and remember what works for them and they often develop a sense of independence, self-reliance and pride.

04

It is valued for being a private, convenient, neutral space to externalise thoughts

We validated that some of the critical attributes we had built into the service were valued by our users. Being able to write and speak thoughts, that were previously internal, helps people process them. And the fact they are stored in the app, lends a welcome sense of weight and significance to the process. Absolute privacy has helped people explore thoughts they wouldn’t have done otherwise and was a critical reason why some adopted the app. Having Hold available at all times created a sense of comfort and made self-reflection more achievable in people’s busy lives. The simplistic nature of the app and the light touch prompts provide structure for people, but leave plenty of room for them to act as they wish, offering a flexibility that respects their process.

05

Our users suffer from anxiety more than we expected

We found that our most frequent users are more anxious than we had previously anticipated. Through previous research we hypothesised that our most likely target user would be someone who is experiencing symptoms of anxiety, but is not formally engaging in professional therapeutic services and does not effectively self-reflect. However, the users engaging the most with the app were often already professionally diagnosed with anxiety type disorders and often had regular therapy. These users tended to prefer the app as a regular mechanism to manage their conditions and in some cases used the app and their conversations to inform their therapy sessions.

Jump to:

Dimensions of change

Body

Your relationship with your body may be pressurised but you could have more capacity than ever to control it.

Propositions

Mymes

Mymes uses an understanding of people’s behaviour to create simulations of their future to help them make decisions and it distills different sides of their character to help them explore who they are.

Emerging discussions

What has this service taught us more broadly? Beyond simply exploring what self-reflection can mean to people and how they may engage with it in the future, this service raises many new areas of interest with regard to people’s attitudes towards understanding themselves through technology. Below we discuss the service in relation to the original question: How might AI be used to help people gain agency over their lives? We briefly touch on four topics about harnessing valuable formats of interaction, about how people are treating themselves, what people need in exchange for their data and what it means for a service to have an identity and a relationship with its users.

01

Mimicking engrained interactions

This service invites people to act directly to improve the management of their thoughts and their lives. To do this, the core feature available is a small heuristic that mimics a conversation with someone else and in doing so, it insights learning and development. The fact that simply mimicking such an engrained format of communication has helped people engage with and understand complex thought, demonstrates an opportunity to explore co-opting other formats to enrich complex exchanges.

02

People are gaming themselves

In addition to the opportunities for exploring the co-opting of interactions. This heuristic also tells a story of people’s increased understanding and acceptance of their logical inconsistencies in order to help themselves. Simply by mimicking a conversation, this device enables people to overcome stigma and think more clearly, even though they are knowingly participating in an illusion or role play.

This willingness to indulge in an illusion that they are having a conversation with someone else, is an acknowledgement on the part of the user of their own human irrationalities and an awareness of the factious or demanding nature of their thought processes and what conditions are required to unravel a complex personal issue.

This speaks of a humble, pastoral dynamic people have with themselves and a willingness to bring technology into that dynamic, demonstrating a high level of trust in technology. People are essentially saying, ‘I’m unable to think clearly and while I want to speak to someone else that’s not appropriate, however, I can overcome these problems by pretending to have a conversation.’

Is this a sign of an emerging shift in people’s attitudes toward themselves that maturely embraces some of the anomalous irrationalities in human behaviour in order to develop more control and ultimately be happier? Is this a collective increase in meta-cognition? Does it demonstrate a shift in people’s relationship with mental health, the role that technology can have within it and a willingness to game themselves?

03

The price of sharing our data is to be shown ourselves

There is a commonly discussed public concern about companies collecting data about us and the power they may wield as that data enables them to understand us and potentially control us. Yuval Noah Harari speaks of a need to learn and understand ourselves so we cannot be easily manipulated by technology. This dynamic equates to an arms race of knowledge about ourselves. Services such as Hold build both sides of that arms race, enriching the individual and the company with knowledge of the user. Can this growth continue symbiotically? Will us humans reach our capacity too quickly? Will technology always have more scope for growth? Would this be technology companies greatest trick in gaining control?

When asking people what they consider as a fair exchange for sharing data about themselves, they are ostensibly responding by saying that they want the same thing companies do —to understand themselves. Does this mean people do not understand the risks of data sharing or does it represent how much people crave knowledge of themselves?

04

Who is the service?

Another interesting area of discussion that emerges from the service is about the relationship people form with the service as an entity. In this particular situation, the user mentally manifests another entity with whom they directly converse, but the app itself also has an identity. In this case, the identity is intended to manifest as a neutral, trustworthy, informed and non-judgemental presence that lends authority to the space and in turn helps the user respect their own process of reflection. In many emerging therapeutic services, the identity of the service is also the other entity with which a user interacts and converses with.

One of the challenges with designing the ‘Hold’ service was establishing the right positionality of the artificial ‘voice’ in the app (the instructive guide), so that it hosts the user in the space in the correct way allowing them to form the correct relationship with the activities conducted within it. There is a complexity in the interplay and overlapping of the brand of the service, the identity of any voices within it and the space. This complexity was carefully considered for our users, however, as we see more complex services emerge where some of the voices of the service are artificial, directly interacting with users and deeply engaged with a user in a long-term intimate exploration of themselves, there is not only an imperative to fastidiously curate that dynamic on a level not so far paralleled. But there is also a need to consider how these dynamics must be customised for each individual and how these relationships will influence people, perhaps years into a relationship.
Our service represents a willingness on the part of the user to engage with other entities of different, alien characteristics in an emotionally intimate and trusting dynamic. That trusting dynamic is fascinating, filled with potential, powerful and comes with a heavy responsibility

Team
Nafeesa Jafferjee
Nikolaos Melachrinos

Other services developed

hold-hero-image-xploratory

Live Services

Hold

Hold is an app that gives people the personal space to let out whatever is on their mind and relax knowing that it is stored safely. It helps people give structure to their internal dialogue making self reflection become more effective.

Live Services

Edit

Edit is an app that helps you fill your daily routine with more positive actions than smoking. It’s not about quitting cold turkey or feeling like a patient. It’s just about trying new things and seeing if they work for you and your lifestyle.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

The commoditisation of our needs and values to incentivise behaviour change

Need Commoditisers

Altered and automated engagement with beliefs

In the future, we foresee a possible advancement of AI with the ability to codify and model the highly complex ethical parameters of everyday life. Services could evolve to  understand, translate and guide people through the implied ethical components of decisions —ranging from who to vote for, who to pray for, what products to buy or abstain from, which organisations to support, how to raise a child or educate them and who to follow. With this technological capacity, we envisage a politicisation of many organisations and activities, and an ability to track behaviours and allocate people to distinct ethical categories, opening a type of transparency and clarity to people’s beliefs.

The complexity of adhering to ethical principles and making distinct choices often leads to people wanting to outsource these decisions. This is fundamentally not that new. People frequently default to other ethical structures such as religious leaders, familial beliefs, friendship groups, social media bubbles, journalists or role models etc. for guidance. In this context, what has the potential to expand is the ability to clearly select and integrate your own values with other adopted ethical structures and allow them to algorithmically integrate and guide you clearly through everyday decisions.

What might be down the path?

Within this new type of relationship between people and services, we may find that people in the public domain, with influence in whatever form, could become ethical leaders. They could ascribe their own beliefs to public ethics platforms and amass followers who  adopt their guidance and integrate their ethics into their own. Consider adding a David Attenborough plugin to your ethics system or Stormzy, Donald Trump or any instagram influencer or being able to see who your friends and family ‘follow’ and being able to do the same. Might professional ethicists and philosophers gain new importance? Consider then, those influencers guiding and recommending what food you eat, what you believe from the bible, what you read, what your children see online, what films you watch or who you vote for.  

This concept embedded into politics becomes even more interesting. The examples above are mostly figures outside political organisations, but they become more political through these services. If politicians did the same, their values would be more transparent and their alignment or misalignment to your own values could be clear. Particularly, as there will likely be some sort of tracking of these behaviours, and perhaps a willingness for politicians to declare their adherence to the values they proclaim  —similar to the publicising of tax returns.

Another emerging component of this future landscape is that people may feel less freedom to explore and live the values they inherently believe in, in favour of the values that are ascribed and popularised by their influencers. There could emerge a difference between what people believe and the ethics and values they live by. Ultimately evolving into an environment in which people’s freedoms are restricted. These services may initially represent an opportunity for people to live more closely with their values, but could eventually alter the integrity or the honesty with which people engage with their values —unless efforts are made to distinguish and develop an individual’s perspective as well.

Each proposition is a vehicle to help map this territory.

Find out how we ‘Framed strategic questions’ to define the design research.

01

Ethos

Ethos is a proposition that learns, tracks and guides people’s behaviours to help them live more in line with their values and beliefs.

02

Greencoin

Greencoin is a proposition that tracks your environmental impact. When you have a positive impact you earn Greencoin currency, which can be spent on sustainable products.

03

Mobible

Mobible is a proposition that helps connect your faith with you, your life and your community via a chatbot. It is based on church teachings and knowledge decoded from the scripture.

04

Empath

Empath assesses and builds student’s social intelligence and empathy for other people through in-school, personalised, immersive story-telling.

05

Kinderpendent

Kinderpendent helps you understand how balanced your child’s online exposure is to challenging social topics and perspectives. It manages that exposure through intelligent balancing and censorship tools and offers advice and support for parents and children while navigating big topics.

Jump to:

Proposition Types

Agency Enhancers

Developing a deeper AI driven understanding of yourself to influence your decisions and optimise for your happiness and prosperity.

Proposition Types

Self-Editors

Optimising and Editing yourself and your life to meet your personal criteria for success.

Other Proposition types

Proposition Types

Ethics Providers

Platforms as facilitators and brokers of value judgements. It’s possible that in the future we could foresee an advancement of AI with the ability to codify and model the highly complex ethical parameters of everyday life.

Proposition Types

Relationship Facilitators

Creating and facilitating relationships through enhanced empathy and compatibility.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

The commoditisation of our needs and values to incentivise behaviour change

Need Commoditisers

Empowered but contentious social connections

In the future, we may see a progression in AI whereby it becomes capable of codifying relationship dynamics and learning methodologies that can bring different personality types together in different ways and intimately learn the characteristics of individuals. With these new capacities, services could be put to use forging new and varied types of relationships and assisting people through their myriad complexities.

The power that these services develop could make us passive players in an orchestrated culture curated by the service. Relationship facilitators could also empower their users with greater self-awareness and understanding, increasing our capacity to grow as individuals among more harmonious relationships and communities.

What might be down the path

In these scenarios, there are three important considerations that may indirectly emerge:

  • Firstly, should these services become commonplace, there may be implications for the culture of our relationships. 
    • Even the context of the initiation of relationships has a large bearing on the nature of the culture that is formed between people. With enough frequency of algorithmically initiated introductions, it could be possible to see a proliferation of different types of relationships. 
    • In a similar way, but to a lesser degree, one could argue that the current ubiquity of dating app introductions between people has led to more ambiguity about the emotional commitment that can be assumed in early relationships. This shift may consequently lead to a negative change in trust dynamics or a positive change in the independence of individual identities in relationships.
    • These changes are potentially minor and normal in the course of history, however when we see the integration of services into the management of relationships in an ongoing manner, their culture and dynamics are surely, for better or worse – malleable. This alludes to a deeper issue with all of these services that interject, coordinate and manage our relationships —If the level of service interference in our lives continues to escalate and the data and intelligence upon which they operate continues to swell, at what point do these services disrupt what is authentically us? And how important/valuable is that?  
  • Secondly, there is a possibility that an interesting dependence may befall us, if we become reliant on these services to guide our interpersonal relationships. 
    • It is perhaps important for services to make the data, insight and knowledge available and understandable to each user so that their own capacity for relationship skills is heightened and the technology does not make us less resilient. 
  • Another interesting parallel can be drawn between this scenario and the present day situation where most young couples meet through digital match-making services. Could it be argued that culture has shifted and depleted the opportunities for ‘undesigned / unplanned’ introductions and could this have an impact on people’s capacity to approach strangers or make instinctive decisions about compatibility. 
  • Thirdly, with these concerns about unwanted influence and dependence aside, there are a plethora of incredible ways that these types of technologies can be used to integrate people into new communities and society in general, even just with the emergence of cultures that welcome algorithmically made introductions. 
    • Even the introduction of in-relationship interventions could be massively supportive for people who struggle with getting to know others, with maintaining friendships or people who frequently repeat mistakes in relationships.
    •  From a societal perspective, we could look to these tools as a way to innovate and alter the fabric of relationships between people, strengthening connections where it is valuable for people individually and as a community.
    •  However, as with all these services there are huge risks. While these services may be used to bolster communities to build resilience, tolerance and social capital, they may also strengthen divisive or exclusionary communities or, from a less malevolent perspective, by strengthening some interactions, others may be neglected.

  

Find out how we ‘Framed strategic questions’ to define the design research.
01

Empath

Empath assesses and builds student’s social intelligence and empathy for other people through in-school, personalised, immersive storytelling.

02

Eros

Eros is a romantic relationship coach and assistant, wrapped into the convenience of an app.

03

Yolt

Yolt is a community building app that orchestrates group meetings online and offline by matching people based on the potential quality of a conversation not simply based on being similarly minded.

Jump to:

Proposition Types

Agency Enhancers

Developing a deeper AI driven understanding of yourself to influence your decisions and optimise for your happiness and prosperity.

Proposition Types

Self-Editors

Optimising and Editing yourself and your life to meet your personal criteria for success.

Other Proposition types

Proposition Types

Ethics Providers

Platforms as facilitators and brokers of value judgements. It’s possible that in the future we could foresee an advancement of AI with the ability to codify and model the highly complex ethical parameters of everyday life.

Proposition Types

Relationship Facilitators

Creating and facilitating relationships through enhanced empathy and compatibility.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

The commoditisation of our needs and values to incentivise behaviour change

Need Commoditisers

Shaping yourself, to what agenda?

As we look to the future, we can envision an environment where AI may have continued to expand in its sophistication and become intertwined in our lives. At the same time, we may see a continued exploration, and advancement and adoption of biotechnology, which integrates digital tools and performance enhancing into our bodies.

We explore these ideas through the lens of two propositions that investigate how these advancements offer people the opportunity to enhance themselves, tune their lives, improve their performance and edit the way that they operate in the world. These services offer people the capacity to alter themselves in new ways. Thus, we explore how that may work and what might happen if they were to proliferate in society.

What might be down the path?

The integration of such powerful technology in our lives could potentially enable a radical new capacity to shape individuals and tackle ubiquitous problems at scale, whether it is diet, wellbeing, concentration, sleep or physical fitness. Some services may work to build a person’s ability to control their own lives without the service, while there may well be other services that could result in people’s dependence on them. In both instances, it’s likely that services will amass huge amounts of data that may result in the capacity to make highly accurate and customised recommendations for people about how to tackle whatever issues they’re facing —the opportunities are vast.

Although these ideas and attitudes are optimistic and positive, they are typical of a solutionist approach to humanity. In other words, they imply that each problem we face can be solved with technology. Not only is that obviously incorrect, but when the approach is applied to people as individuals, their characters, identities or behaviours, we are forced to ask which ‘problems’ should be solved. Should one enhance their sleep, or reduce their predilection to argue, optimise their ability to communicate, build their physical strength or lengthen their capacity to concentrate? Maybe yes, if that makes them happy, but when could editing oneself over-reach? One could argue that the approach and it’s philosophy provoke or even force an impulse to maximise oneself for performance, whether it is performance at the gym or at work, or in their social lives. Could extending the intent to maximise yourself ever prevent you enjoying yourself? When does  self-improvement become self-harm?

Both propositions give people new powers to adapt who they are. Edit (a DIY behavioural habit changer) is a less drastic proposal than Pyro (a biotech performance enhancing service), but it shows a glimpse of a service that may one day become more potent, offering behavioural tweaks that could radically change how someone acts.

One could argue that it is a fairly ubiquitous aspiration for people to want to increase their available choices about who they are and what capacities they have in life. But, is there a risk for people when they are offered these choices? Is this a paternalistic or pastoral concern? Clearly, within the biotech proposal, there is a need to protect people physiologically, but within both concepts there are potential risks to a person’s psychology or sense of identity. There may be potential problems in working conditions, workers’ rights or societal tensions. Who has the capacity to minimise the dangers here? At what point should an authority decide that people do not have the capacity to make radical decisions about self-improvement?

Within this space, we return to the topic of agency and ask to what extent do these services improve it? Sociology defines agency as the ability to act independently and make free choices. Therefore, to improve agency, we can increase available options, increase capacity to access those options and liberate individuals from structures that determine or limit their choice between options. If our general objective is to improve agency, we demonstrate our belief that decisions made with agency are preferable. But the above discussion around protecting people, and many of the proposals within this project, operate under the assumption that people are frequently irrational and in many cases we see future services that support the user in overcoming those irrationalities. Therefore, we are extending our ambition beyond simply giving people independence in choice, to also try to enhance people’s capacity to make those choices well? It is not clear how people should be supported to make decisions about improving themselves when their powers are more radical and the pressures on them may be heightened.

More significantly than in other categories of proposition, we are forced to consider what contribution these services offer to people’s agency. They are self-editing services, which potentially give people unprecedented power over themselves, but do not enhance their capacity to wield that power. When does that become a problem?

Each proposition below is a vehicle that helps us map this territory

Find out how studio teams ‘defined the problem area’.
Read More
01

Pyro

Pyro has the best access to the latest and safest physical and mental augmentations on the market. As soon as these products and services are on the market, you can get them from us.

02

Edit

Edit is a lifestyle service that helps you edit things in and out of your life through enriched tracking and mini-experiments.

Jump to:

Proposition Types

Agency Enhancers

Developing a deeper AI driven understanding of yourself to influence your decisions and optimise for your happiness and prosperity.

Other Proposition types

Proposition Types

Ethics Providers

Platforms as facilitators and brokers of value judgements. It’s possible that in the future we could foresee an advancement of AI with the ability to codify and model the highly complex ethical parameters of everyday life.

Proposition Types

Relationship Facilitators

Creating and facilitating relationships through enhanced empathy and compatibility.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

The commoditisation of our needs and values to incentivise behaviour change

Need Commoditisers

Empowering or unsettling intimacy with tech

This category of services identifies a selection of propositions where the value is, in large part, derived directly from educating the user about themselves. We foresee how an increased prevalence of AI in our lives could be used, not just to advise people, but to educate people about themselves in order to expand their personal agency. The sophistication of data collection and analysis and the increasing overlap between services and our lives means that services have huge potential to share their knowledge and expand our capacity through self awareness. However, through the following investigations, we have discussed many ways in which these services must be devised carefully to prevent unintended consequences.

What might be down the path?

One of the first considerations is that digital services are largely based on the ‘app’ market and there may be a perception that apps generally provide extrinsic quick fixes for a small investment.

Apps typically don’t cost a lot of money and most users expect to see quick returns for their time or money. It’s in this backdrop that the market has developed and expectations have been set.

Subsequently, it is plausible that services that help people learn about themselves may suffer, because often those services have to learn about you first or if not they may require you to self-analyse or critically reflect. Essentially, it is difficult for a service to position itself (either through brand of the general positionality of the service) so that it seems serious enough to be respected. but not so serious that it seems like it might ask too much before giving anything back.

While the first consideration is about how to establish users’ relationship with a service, the second is about what shape these new relationships may take. For these services to truly build agency it is important that they or the user correctly balance the involvement of the service in the user’s life, so that happiness is not dependent on the service. They must engage users in such a way that their knowledge of themselves and ability to act on that knowledge is constantly elevated without also damaging people’s existing networks and support systems.

As with all digital services of this nature, it is also important to consider what impact interventions may have if they were to expand massively in scale. Agency building services require self understanding to build self control, but there are different ways of understanding (i.e. western or eastern), which may influence someone’s identity, culture or mental health if extended throughout their life. One could argue that instagram has been a problematic self-understanding tool, because it has influenced some people’s sense of identity by encouraging their comparison with inauthentic representations of others. So, perhaps there should be varied mechanisms for self understanding to offer users choice. Additionally, services may need to be cautious implying good and bad values against a users persona, whether it is with likes, or followers, scores or access. This gamification in such intimate circumstances could have heightened impact.

Within this category of services there is clearly a heightened risk that goes hand in hand  with the increased levels of intimacy in the relationship people have with their technology. However, we can also see a strong set of principles begin to emerge for how technology can offer new intrinsic value to people, that can empower them, build self-assurance, resilience and freedom by strengthening the skills they need to learn for themselves how to live the way they would like to.

Each proposition below is a vehicle which helps us map this territory.

Find out how we ‘Framed strategic questions’ to define the design research.
Read More
01

EQLS

EQLS is a digital space where people can speak to AI characters about anything they’d like. They help people learn about themselves and they help life get easier.

02

Mymes

Mymes uses an understanding of people’s behaviour to create simulations of their future to help them make decisions. It distills different sides of their character to help them explore who they are.

03

Spark

Spark is a service that helps you discover your financial personality to align it with your consumption. It helps you make better financial decisions and achieve financial health and wellbeing.

04

Qualitime

Qualitime helps you track how everything you do influences your happiness and your life expectancy so that you can decide what is most important to you.

05

Edit

Edit is a lifestyle service that helps you edit things in and out of your life through enriched tracking and mini-experiments.

Jump to:

Proposition Types

Agency Enhancers

Developing a deeper AI driven understanding of yourself to influence your decisions and optimise for your happiness and prosperity.

Proposition Types

Relationship Facilitators

Creating and facilitating relationships through enhanced empathy and compatibility.

Other Proposition types

Proposition Types

Ethics Providers

Platforms as facilitators and brokers of value judgements. It’s possible that in the future we could foresee an advancement of AI with the ability to codify and model the highly complex ethical parameters of everyday life.

Proposition Types

Relationship Facilitators

Creating and facilitating relationships through enhanced empathy and compatibility.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

Body

Your relationship with your body may be under pressure, but you could have more capacity than ever to control it.

The forces acting on ‘Money’ in the future

Among the many possible ways that people’s relationship with money may change in the future, we explore three ways it may align with other concepts to alter perceptions of its role in our lives.

We explore how in-depth quantification of our emotional state may be used to extract more meaningful value from our money or how the quantified value of our ‘happiness’ may be cross-referenced with our spending behaviour and used to assess how happy money makes. It could also be used to manipulate us or even traded as a proxy for money.

We look at how money could be considered a form of national infrastructure that embroils people in a system they may not trust or want to be a part of, and subsequently, could lead to the establishment of new decentralised currencies. These new currencies may help reframe a more complex view of money and what its roles could be in a local economy.

Finally, a globalised society that witnesses the huge opulence of a minority alongside the acute poverty of the majority may establish a growing distaste for wealth and capitalism and turn against the rich. In this context, vast wealth may come to be seen as a consequence of unethical practices and be tied to a responsibility to amend wrongs and promote social or environmental justice.

With these potential forces acting on people’s relationship with money, we explore three hypothetical scenarios: Emotional money, Connected Localism and Wealth Legacy.

These scenarios consist of a future context (that is based on a trend analysis) and a concept of a future person whose experience of money has a large bearing on their happiness. For these future people, we predict needs, desires and future pain points relating to their future context and use this as a basis for the ideation of provocative future concepts that may solve some of the needs of the future person.

01

Personal control

Obsession with measuring everything that goes in and out of the body amplifies obsessive conditions. Personal identity becomes the virtual idealised (perfect) self instead of current physical reality. Devices measure everything and anything about people.

Jump To:

Service visions

Eidos

Eatopia is a platform with the mission to support individuals on the journey to plant-based diets by promoting a choice of healthy plant-based products over those which contain a lot of sugar, fat, sodium and meat.
Find out how we ‘Explored the future landscape with the project client’.
02

Connected localism

Decentralised infrastructures may be adopted by ‘smart’ localised communities to provide an escape route for those who feel that larger, more traditional infrastructures always work to entrap the public.

Jump To:

Service visions

Off-chain

Offchain is a toolkit for smart localisation that allows it’s communities to connect and access modernity without having to forego their data privacy.
Find out how we ‘Prioritised the societal dimensions related to health and happiness’.
03

Wealth legacy

In a world facing more and more turmoil and inequality, the super-rich may be held to account for their impact on the world and may be increasingly expected to use their wealth to support people who are disempowered or in peril.

Jump To:

Service visions

Legacy

Legacy helps wealthy people understand the impact they have had on the planet and shares the ways they have had a positive impact.

Recommended readings

Proposition Types

Relationship Facilitators

Creating and facilitating relationships through enhanced empathy and compatibility.

Proposition Types

Agency Enhancers

Developing a deeper AI driven understanding of yourself to influence your decisions and optimise for your happiness and prosperity.

Proposition Types

Self-Editors

Optimising and Editing yourself and your life to meet your personal criteria for success.

Would you like to know more?

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.

Let's Talk!

Let's find the place to think, the freedom to challenge and the capability to act on real change. Together.